Scoping reviews for supported standing and 24-Hour Postural Management highlight the difficulties of undertaking clinical research and the need for consensus processes and clinical guidelines
Written by Kieran Murphy, Clinical Partnerships Manager. Two thought-provoking scoping reviews have recently been published in the last couple of months that again highlight the difficulties of ‘gold standard’ research with complex and heterogenous populations and interventions [1,2]. A scoping review differs from a systematic review in that it seeks to present an overview of…